The Sanitization of Operative ٦٦٦ Mahmoud Khalil: Testing U.S.A Vulnerabilities
- rossglick5
- Mar 13
- 5 min read
Updated: Mar 18
Mahmoud Khalil, a 30‐year‐old Syrian, a former Columbia University student and activist, has become the poster child for a carefully manufactured narrative that frames him as a victim of government repression. While his supporters portray him as a dissident fighting for free speech, the reality is far more concerning. Khalil was not merely an outspoken student but a key leader, primary spokesperson, and negotiator for Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD)—the same organization that recently rescinded an apology for violent rhetoric and reaffirmed its call for resistance through force.
Khalil’s leadership in CUAD during the illegal encampments and building takeovers was not incidental; it was strategic. CUAD operates not as an organic student movement but as part of a broader, well-financed network designed to push an anti-American, anti-Israel agenda under the guise of human rights activism. The radicalization of campus movements, as demonstrated by CUAD’s own actions and Khalil’s involvement, exposes a deeper infiltration of foreign influence, ideological extremism, and financial manipulation designed to destabilize democratic institutions from within.
CUAD: A Front for Foreign Agendas : Ties to Extremist Rhetoric and Calls for Violence
CUAD has repeatedly demonstrated its true nature—not as a peaceful advocacy group, but as an organization that endorses violence as a legitimate tool of political change. The recent controversy surrounding CUAD’s former spokesperson, Khymani James, illustrates this point. James, who previously livestreamed a school meeting in which he openly stated that “Zionists don’t deserve to live”, later doubled down, comparing his stance to the necessity of Hitler’s death for world peace.
While CUAD initially issued an apology, they rescinded it, claiming they were pressured into conforming to media expectations. Instead, the group reaffirmed its support for “resistance” and invoked the names of Marxist revolutionaries Fidel Castro and Frantz Fanon—further confirming their alignment with radical, anti-Western ideologies. This is the organization Mahmoud Khalil was instrumental in leading, serving as both its primary negotiator and the face of its illegal activities on campus.
CUAD’s calls for violence and its refusal to distance itself from rhetoric advocating for the death of political opponents are not isolated incidents. They are part of a broader pattern of radicalization that aligns with the tactics and objectives of foreign-backed extremist networks. The fact that Columbia University has continued to tolerate, if not enable, this group raises serious questions about the role of academic institutions in fostering or ignoring domestic subversion.
The Financial Web: Who Funds CUAD?
CUAD’s ability to orchestrate large-scale protests, occupy buildings, and coordinate legal defenses for its members is not the work of an independent student movement—it is a well-funded operation backed by a network of ideological and financial supporters. Who is paying for this?
Primary Funders Behind CUAD’s Operations
At the top of CUAD’s funding pyramid are organizations with deep ties to anti-American and anti-Israel activism, many of which have foreign connections and questionable financial transparency:
The Rockefeller Brothers Fund (RBF)
Known for funding anti-Israel BDS movements, RBF has provided significant financial backing to groups advocating for economic warfare against Israel. Their long-standing support for anti-Zionist causes aligns directly with CUAD’s mission.
The Open Society Foundations (OSF)
Founded by George Soros, OSF has played a critical role in funding radical left-wing activism, including pro-BDS organizations. OSF’s complex grant system makes it difficult to trace direct financial links, but its broader funding strategy indicates alignment with CUAD’s objectives.
American Muslims for Palestine (AMP)
A suspected front for Hamas-linked organizations, AMP has been a major source of funding and logistical support for Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP), one of CUAD’s closest allies in campus activism. AMP’s financial support effectively places CUAD within a larger network of groups with documented ties to extremist organizations.
The Network of Proxies and Money Laundering Schemes : CUAD’s funding is not always direct, making it difficult to track. Instead, money flows through proxy organizations that operate under the banner of social justice while channeling funds toward radical activism.
Students for Justice in Palestine (SJP): A primary organizer of anti-Israel activism in American universities, SJP has been directly linked to CUAD’s leadership and funding networks. SJP’s financial ties to AMP and other Middle Eastern benefactors suggest a well-orchestrated
financial pipeline supporting radical campus movements.
The U.S. Campaign for Palestinian Rights (USCPR): This organization has been tied to
financially supporting groups with extremist affiliations, making it a key player in funding BDS efforts and CUAD’s protests.
Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP): While branding itself as a progressive Jewish organization, JVP has long been a financial and ideological ally of BDS movements, lending credibility and resources to CUAD.
These organizations form a multi-tiered laundering scheme, ensuring that foreign money, extremist rhetoric, and radical activism are carefully distributed across college campuses while maintaining the illusion of student-led initiatives.
Columbia University’s Complicity: A Safe Haven for Extremism?
Despite multiple warnings and documented incidents of calls for violence, Columbia University has failed to take meaningful action against CUAD and its leaders. Interim President Katrina Armstrong’s recent condemnation of CUAD’s rhetoric was too little, too late. The university has allowed these groups to fester, providing them with institutional legitimacy and a platform to push their extremist ideology.
Even after Mahmoud Khalil, Khymani James, and other CUAD organizers engaged in illegal building takeovers, issued violent threats, and aligned themselves with foreign-backed networks, Columbia has continued to tolerate their activities. Worse, in some cases, university resources and student government funds have been used to finance these radical movements.
CUAD’s recent call for students to wear masks and conceal tattoos to avoid identification underscores the militant nature of its operations. This is not activism—it is subversion, funded and coordinated to destabilize.
Conclusion: The Mahmoud Khalil Case is a Warning
Mahmoud Khalil is not an innocent student caught in a political crossfire—he is a calculated operative who led a radicalized movement that openly calls for violence against political opponents. His detention and potential deportation are not about free speech but about national security and the integrity of American institutions.
The same organization he led, CUAD, has now explicitly endorsed violence as a “path forward.” This is not a coincidence, but rather the natural evolution of an extremist movement funded and supported by a web of foreign-linked organizations.
The American public must wake up to the reality that our universities have become battlegrounds for ideological warfare, where foreign-backed activists are allowed to exploit academic freedom to push violent, anti-democratic agendas.
A overarching question, why institutions like Columbia continue to shield people like him?
#ExposeCUAD #CampusRadicalization #ForeignInfluence #StopBDS #ColumbiaComplicity #RuleOfLaw #WakeUpAmerica #DefendDemocracy #freeamericafromhamas #nycprotest #shaidavidai #usa #godblessamerica #asranomani #rossglick
Follow on X @18urbanwarrior or IG @the_urbanwarrior
Contact Information
Ross Glick | Policy Advocate & Strategy Advisor
rossglick@gmail.com : 917.821.9942
Comentarios